Hi All,
Sorry for the lapse of time in between posts, I have been admittedly paying more attention to my new website. But I’m back! I am going to continue posting personal updates on this site, but will also be speaking more about openings, shows and the accolades of others. Please feel free to comment and leave your feedback!
Sorry for the lapse of time in between posts, I have been admittedly paying more attention to my new website. But I’m back! I am going to continue posting personal updates on this site, but will also be speaking more about openings, shows and the accolades of others. Please feel free to comment and leave your feedback!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9569d/9569d4888c9b5338789cf8dbc41b4af7b9135559" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd3db/dd3dbc8b584846f820794bcb8eab76d8130fe68b" alt=""
In terms of the show, the ICA does a fantastic job of transforming the galleries. Each of the past three major shows I have been to in the new facility (Louise Bourgeois, Anish Kapoor and now Shepard Fairey) rendered the space unrecognizable each time.
The show represented a variety of Fairey’s work from the span of his career, and showed a huge range in size, medium, and content. I was partial to his large paintings because of the evidence of the artist’s hand, where things intersected and deleted other layers, rather than every element being put in it’s spot and told to stay there, as I felt with his screen prints. The prints were so perfectly registered that I wondered why the designs weren’t just printed off the computer they were initially made on. I was very attracted to the “retired” stencils that are framed and now basically drawings. The amount of work in the galleries was overwhelming, I would suggest giving yourself at least two hours to soak it all in. I left the show knowing it was an important one, glad I went, and tired.